Balloons Gen 5 Avionics

From Stanford SSI Wiki
Revision as of 05:36, 15 July 2018 by Vnguyen5 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kermit
Part of the HABEES series
Gen5s.PNG
Chief Designer Vinh Nguyen
Technology Line Balloons Core Avionics
Version Generation V
Name Kermit
General
HONEY Standards Venom Breakout Fang Breakout Board Naming
Core Architecture
Gen 1 Architecture HONEY
Core Avionics
Oscar Cookie Monster Elmo The Count
Core Power
Apple Turnover Biscuit
Core Peripherals
Medusa Cobra Viper QueenBee ProtoBee
Core Radio
Macaw
Test & Prototype
QueenBee
Guides
Making a HONEY Board Using STINGR Using QueenBee Making a Prototype
VE

Kermit is the fifth revision of the HABEES Standard Avionics Platform. It implements most of the functionality that exists in Gen 4 rev 2 Avionics, but the architecture of the boards has been changed, and functionality removed to reduce the complexity of implementation and application of the flight stack.

Kermit provides the following flight critical systems features:

  • A Teensy 3.6 embedded Microcontroller
  • A ublox-M8Q GNSS (GPS/GLONASS/Beidou/Galileo) receiver with embedded patch antenna
  • MicroSD data logging
  • A thermocouple for external temperature sensing
  • Two BMP280 pressure/temperature sensors
  • A PWM-operated cutdown FET
  • An inboard heater
  • Power, CAN, and data bus connectors
  • 8 RGB indicator LED's about various system states
  • A power-selector to enable 5V operation from BMS or USB
  • CAN Transceiver for use with the HONEY CAN bus
  • Additional bypass capacitors
  • Current sensors for GPS and Cutdown

Notable differences from the previous generation include:

  • SiLabs 4463 Radio, the same used as Valbal v9.

This provides a higher bandwidth data link for use by expansion boards so that future applications need only generate data and send it to main avionics.

  • Connector for Iridium RockBlock module

An embedded module proved to be too difficult to implement in the previous revision, while not providing significant benefit over using the out-of-the-box RockBlock module + connector alternative.


Development

Given the difficulty that was experienced in assembling and testing the previous generation of standard avionics, the current generation was built with the primary goal in mind of reducing the complexity and producing a system whose core functionality is easier to realize and least liable to fail after assembly (given that most likely avionics must be manually assembled and debugged). Several changes were made from Rev 4.2 in order to reduce the complexity:

  • The data bus was split into two, and the number of pins broken out was reduced only to the number of GPIOs free after all avionics systems, simplifying routing and reducing the number of pins.
  • Abandoning an embedded RockBlock and its dedicated power circuitry, which required a large footprint and ultimately incredibly dense packing and clever routing to accommodate the rest of the system.
  • Removing auxiliary heater FETs
  • Removing some current sensors, because power consumption data for its own sake is not considered a priority for standard-profile launches
  • Removing the second, excessive CAN bus
  • Removing the IMU
  • Removing watchdog circuitry, because historical standard-profile launches have not shown frequent anomalies that would make a watchdog critical, let alone problems that would be solved by the watchdog as it was implemented in Gen 4.2
  • Forgoing power select circuitry for a simple switch

Testing

The boards are set to be assembled and tested during the fall of the 2018/19 academic year, with a first launch planned for Winter 2019.

Issues

The inclusion of the SiLabs radio may be adding unnecessary complexity that is best deferred to an expansion board.

PCB Layout

Gen 5 Avionics remains a 4-layer board, compliant with Gen 2 Architecture. All signals were routed on the top and bottom layers, while only the heater trace went beyond those two layers. While it may be possible to route the heater trace on the top and bottom layer, it will be much more difficult, if impossible, to apply the traces directly to the components which require heat, such as the GPS and MCU.

Schematics