Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • As specified in NASA’s engineering design life cycle, multiple design reviews are used to assess the feasibility and practicality of both attempt ...ucted. The final stage of the review process is the Post Launch Assessment Review (PLAR).
    2 KB (357 words) - 03:37, 14 June 2016
  • ...lly ending with an L3 rocket that successfully flies the thoroughly tested design. The technology coming out of this project will benefit the Rockets Team’ ...h, 2. preliminary design, 3. critical design, 4. testing and documentation review, 5. build and launch. The milestones will focus on providing hardware - not
    14 KB (2,322 words) - 14:48, 15 September 2017
  • == Design == Our recovery system is somewhat unconventional, and we recognize this is a critical component to the success of our mission. As such, we will conduct extensive
    16 KB (2,515 words) - 14:45, 15 September 2017
  • | footer = Final design of de-spin unit ...main avionics bay will collect sensor information and communicate mission critical parts with the ground station. The unpressurized section is for the altimet
    18 KB (2,900 words) - 14:48, 15 September 2017
  • ...syAJqPgZrezuWSQag/edit?usp=sharing the slides] from our preliminary design review to see the current state of our subsystems. ...are for hardware that does not even exist yet. To make this task easier, a critical and helpful tool are small pieces of code that can simulate the behavior of
    7 KB (1,170 words) - 00:12, 27 October 2020
  • Before you design a board for the HONEY flight stack, ask yourself these questions. Answering # Do you have a very specific design in mind already?
    19 KB (3,375 words) - 23:21, 15 August 2017
  • Rocketry is difficult to master, but worth the tedious design process. The more time you put in, the better your project will turn out as ...e these are designed from scratch and need to go through our NASA-inspired design process.
    28 KB (4,561 words) - 06:17, 17 September 2023