Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎JARVIS I: added analysis
Line 17: Line 17:     
= JARVIS I =
 
= JARVIS I =
 +
 
== Flight Summary ==
 
== Flight Summary ==
 
{|class="wikitable"
 
{|class="wikitable"
 
|'''Date of Flight'''
 
|'''Date of Flight'''
 
|Feb. 20, 2016
 
|Feb. 20, 2016
 +
|-
 +
|'''Launch Location'''
 +
|Tripoli Central California
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''L2 Certification Attempt?'''
 
|'''L2 Certification Attempt?'''
Line 31: Line 35:  
|Recovered, minimal damage to airframe
 
|Recovered, minimal damage to airframe
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 
== Rocket Specs ==
 
== Rocket Specs ==
 
{|class = "wikitable"
 
{|class = "wikitable"
Line 52: Line 57:  
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
== Analysis ==
 +
JARVIS I marked the 2nd attempted rocket flight with on-board electronics for the 2015-2016 year. Flight takeoff was nominal, however, at apogee, the drogue parachute did not deploy, nor did the main chute deploy at any lower altitude. Upon recovery, it was determined that the nose cone was ejected, which helped to increase drag substantially so the rocket did not lawn dart but fell laterally instead. The Raven was operational even after recovery, and the data retrieved from the altimeter concurred with the physical evidence that all ejection chargers successfully fired. The most reasonable hypothesis for the parachute ejection failure was that the size of the ejection charges was simply undersized.
    
[[Category:Rockets]]
 
[[Category:Rockets]]
117

edits

Navigation menu